Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Triangle Linen Service, Inc. & M. & M. Candy Lunch

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1948Published

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.

This motion seeks a stay of the arbitration proceedings and vacatur of the notice of arbitration. It appears from the opposing affidavit that the movant subscribed a printed agreement which stated immediately above the movant’s signature that the agreement was subject to all the terms and conditions set forth on the reverse side thereof. On the reverse side is a printed agreement to submit any controversy under the agreement or arising out of or in relation thereto or for its breach to arbitration. It follows that the movant must proceed to arbitration;

It appears, however, that the name of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Albert v. SpiegelbergNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API