Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Ancient Free & Accepted Masons of Alabama v. Callier

The motion to strike is based on many passages of the bill of exceptions set out in hrec verba. There should have been a narrative recital of the evidence as prescribed by Circuit Court Rule No. 32. Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Farmers’ Produce Co., 17 Ala. App. 388, 85 So. 578; Turner v. Thornton, 192 Ala. 98, 68 So. 813; Harris v. Carter, 220 Ala. 444, 125 So. 608; Woodward Iron Co. v. Herndon, Adm’r, 130 Ala. 364, 30 So. 370. The affirmative charge requested and refused to defendant is thought, by appellant, to be better illustrated by the bill of exceptions as presented. We cannot commend…