Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Colley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 12, 1933No. 4 Div. 722PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

There is no question presented as to the admission or exclusion- of evidence. The appellant contends that there was error in refusing the affirmative charges requested.

The material and controverted question of fact was whether the plaintiff physician rendered such services to defendant’s daughter-in-law upon the credit of defendant. This was a jury question under the attendant circumstances and the reasonable inferences therefrom. Weil v. Centerfit, 201 Ala. 531, 78 So. 885; Wellman v. Jones, 124 Ala. 580, 27 So. 416; Curry v. Shelby, 90 Ala. 277, 7 So. 922. Nothing is plainer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Boykin v. Dohlonde & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  3. Day v. AdcockAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Ancient Free & Accepted Masons of Alabama v. CallierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Wellman v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. AshleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Landers v. RameySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Hudson v. AshleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API