Legal Opinion

Herrmeyer v. Kleeman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1977No. 75-175PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Plaintiffs claim trial court error in submitting to the jury as a matter of law that plaintiffs breached their lease of the office space. The attack is three-pronged, and each prong will be dealt with separately.

Plaintiffs first argue they did not breach the four-month lease by payment of the April rent on April 2nd. The rent for April was due “in advance.” Defendant claims it was due by March 31st. Plaintiffs claim it was due on April 1st, claiming they had all day of April 1st in which to make such rent payment, citing cases in other states so holding.

However, on appeal plaintiffs rely on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hannahs v. NoahSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. JahnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Malco, Inc. v. Midwest Aluminum Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Dalton v. MeisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. StrakaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fahrenberg v. TengelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lundin v. ShimanskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Curtis-Universal, Inc. v. Sheboygan Emergency Medical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Schaffer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API