Legal Opinion

Wiechmann v. Hale

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1960No. 4302PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Pike, J.:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court against appellants, jointly and severally, for the sum of *493$1,475, representing the amount of a real estate broker’s commission found .to be due from them to respondent.

The real estate transaction involved a house on Ferris Lane in Mayberry Park Subdivision in Washoe County, Nevada.

One Wiechmann, as authorized agent for the owner of the premises, Pacific Investment, Inc., listed the dwelling house for sale with respondent, a real estate broker, at a sale price of $29,500. Thereafter a salesman for respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ramezzano v. AvansinoNevada Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. KnobelNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hobson v. OlinNevada Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API