Legal Opinion

Bixler v. Lamendola

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 5, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01819Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEVEN BIXLER, DORIS BIXLER, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-1819 and D&S BIXLER TRUCKING, : INCORPORATED, : (Judge Conner) : Plaintiffs : : v. : : ANDREW LAMENDOLA, : : Defendant : MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs Steven Bixler, Doris Bixler, and D&S Bixler Trucking, Incorporated, assert three state-law personal injury claims against defendant Andrew Lamendola arising from an automobile accident. Lamendola moves for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons that follow, the court will deny Lamendola’s motion. I. Factual…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lawrence Thomas v. Cumberland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API