Ball v. Beaumont
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Perkins county. Tried below before Grimes, J. Rehearing of case reported in 63 Nebr., 215.
1Opinion of the Court
Dan, O.
No objections on this rehearing are made to the statement of the pleadings in the former opinion filed in this court December 4, 1901. 63 Nebr., 215. The only addi*57tion to that statement which is suggested is that plaintiff’s reply alleged the partnership of defendants, and receipt on their part of the money, and ratification, as partners, of its procurement. On the rehearing objection is made to the conclusion'that the allegations inserted by amendment to the answer of Beaumont in the district court, stating that the money was procured and paid for by Penn, and that Beaumont’s relation…
2Cited by2 opinions
- First National Bank v. FairchildNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Ball v. BeaumontNebraska Supreme Court · 1905