Legal Opinion

Ball v. Beaumont

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1905No. 13,698Published

Error to the district court for Perkins county: John R. Thompson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Letton, C.

This case has been before this court three times prior to this. See Ball v. Beaumont, 59 Neb. 631, 63 Neb. 215, and 66 Neb. 56. The issues have been fully stated in the preceding opinions. At the last hearing the law of the case was clearly laid down by Mr. Commissioner Day. It was said by him:

“Plainly, then, the only chance for plaintiff to recover is by the establishment of a partnership transaction, so that Penn’s knoAvledge and ratification of plaintiff’s acts Avould be a ratification by both defendants. The condition of affairs seems to be that plaintiff has no direct knowledge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savage v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ball v. BeaumontNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ball v. BeaumontNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Ball v. BeaumontNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API