Legal Opinion
Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 7, 2013No. 2012-1338PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Apple appeals from the final decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC) that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,663,607 (’607 patent) are invalid and that Motorola does not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,812,828 (’828 patent). Apple challenges the ITC’s claim construction and its determinations of obviousness, anticipation, and noninfringement. For the following reasons, we affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, and vacate-in-part the ITC’s decision and remand for further proceedings.
Background
This patent case involves smartphone touchscreens.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Drilling Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Mintz v. Dietz & Watson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vicor Corporation v. Synqor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- POZEN INC. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010
- Monroe Truck Equipment, Inc. v. Universal Truck Equipment, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- Raytheon Technologies Corp. v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- HQ Specialty Pharma Corp. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025