Legal Opinion
POZEN INC. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 18, 2010No. Civil Action 6:08cv437-LED-JDL, 6:09cv003, 6:09cv182PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN D. LOVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion and Order sets forth the Court’s constructions for the disputed claim terms in the patents asserted by Plaintiff Pozen Inc. (“Pozen”). Po-zen asserts U.S. Patent Nos. 6,060,499 (“the '499 patent”), 6,586,458 (“the '458 patent”), and 7,332,183 (“the '183 patent”) and has filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief (Doc. No. 164) (“Opening”), as well as a Reply in support of Pozen’s proposed constructions (Doc. No. 176) (“Reply”). Defendants Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Alphapharm Pty Ltd., and Dr.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012