Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Cagle

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 14, 1960No. 7 Div. 436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals held that a defendant is entitled to the general charge when the complaint charged that the defendant assaulted and beat plaintiff, and the proof showed that one Stone committed the assault and battery at the instigation of the defendant but not in defendant’s presence. The opinion states:

“It is our conclusion that under the complaint in this case charging a direct assault by the defendant, and under the general principles of pleading and proof referred to above, and the persuasive doctrine enunciated in the Massachusetts and Delaware cases, supra, the lower court erred…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City Delivery Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  2. Southern Bell Telephone Co. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. AbernathySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Trognitz v. FrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Vansant v. KowalewskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alabama Music Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Boatright v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Chambers v. CagleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Continental Development Corporation, Inc. v. VinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API