Legal Opinion

Keota Mills & Elevator v. Gamble

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 2010No. 103,149Published

1Opinion of the Court

243 P.3d 1156 (2010)

2010 OK 12

KEOTA MILLS & ELEVATOR, Appellant/Plaintiff,

v.

Othel GAMBLE, Jr., Appellee/Defendant.

No. 103,149.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

February 16, 2010.

Rehearing Denied December 6, 2010.

Marc L. Bovos, Poteau, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Douglas W. Sanders, Poteau, OK, for Defendant/Appellee.

KAUGER, J.:

¶ 1 This cause concerns an attempt to recover on a defaulted promissory note. The dispositive question presented is whether partial payment on the note extended the time within which to bring an action. The parties stipulated that the issue was whether the suit was time-barred…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API