Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Popovich
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 29, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
31 N.J. Super. 514 (1954)
107 A.2d 345
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NICHOLAS POPOVICH, SR., AND NICHOLAS POPOVICH, JR. INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS N. POPOVICH & SON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 28, 1954.
Decided July 29, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, FRANCIS and FREUND.
Mr. Harry Schaffer argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Waxman & Waxman, attorneys).
Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein argued the cause for the defendants-respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.
This is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Sattelberger v. TelepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Mangani v. Hydro, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Freeman v. AckersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
- Lincks v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Hudson United BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
- Smid v. New Jersey Highway AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993