Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Thieme
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1940No. 6087PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks money judgment on a contract of indemnity signed by defendant on behalf of one E. C. Jones. The facts of the case are not involved nor in dispute. A question of law only is presented.
Jones applied to the Louisiana Public Service Commission for a permit to operate a line of motor vehicles for hire and carrying freight over the highways out of Winn-field to other points in the state, and, as a condition precedent to issuance of the permit, he was required to provide fidelity bond in keeping with Act No. 292 of 1926. This bond was signed by plaintiff, but,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PutfarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- First Nat. Bank v. Hudson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Mills v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1964
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. FellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Cane River Shopping Center v. MonsourLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- American Contractors Indemnity Company v. Galaforo Construction, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.