Legal Opinion

Mrc Innovations, Inc. v. Hunter Mfg., LLP

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 2, 2014No. 2013-1433PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROST, Circuit Judge.

MRC Innovations, Inc. appeals from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio granting summary judgment of invalidity with respect to U.S. Design Patent Nos. D634,488 S (“'488 patent”) and D634,487 S (“'487 patent”). For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

Background

MRC is the owner by assignment of both patents-in-suit. The '488 patent claims an ornamental design for a football jersey for a dog, while the '487 patent does the same for a baseball jersey, as shown below:

[[Image here]]

[[Image here]]

Mark Cohen is the named inventor of both…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dorman Products, Inc. v. Paccar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Lkq Corporation v. Gm Global Technology Operations LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  3. Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. v. Ultraproof, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  4. Wine Enthusiast, Inc. v. Vinotemp Int'l Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Reddy v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API