Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Amoco Oil Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 8, 1997No. Civil Action No. 95-1224-MLBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BELUT, District Judge.

Before the court are the following:

1. Amoco’s motion for summary judgment (Doe. 17);

2. Plaintiffs response (Doc. 23); and

3. Amoco’s reply (Doc. 25).

This is an action pursuant to the Petroleum Marketing Practice Act, (“PMPA”) 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. The essential facts are stipulated (Doc. 16)1 The principal issue for decision is whether Amoco made a bona fide offer to sell the station leased by plaintiff as required by 15 U.S.C. § 2802(b)(3)(D)(iii)(I)2.

Uncontroverted Material Facts

In 1984, plaintiff became an Amoco franchisee. In the spring of 1993,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  2. Slatky, John v. Amoco Oil Company, Service Station Dealers of America, Inc., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Amerada Hess Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Bill Sandlin v. Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. H. Wayne Palmer & Associates v. Heldor Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brad Rhodes v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Brad Rhodes v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Brad Rhodes v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Rhodes v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API