Rhodes v. Amoco Oil Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BELUT, District Judge.
Before the court are the following:
1. Amoco’s motion for summary judgment (Doe. 17);
2. Plaintiffs response (Doc. 23); and
3. Amoco’s reply (Doc. 25).
This is an action pursuant to the Petroleum Marketing Practice Act, (“PMPA”) 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. The essential facts are stipulated (Doc. 16)1 The principal issue for decision is whether Amoco made a bona fide offer to sell the station leased by plaintiff as required by 15 U.S.C. § 2802(b)(3)(D)(iii)(I)2.
Uncontroverted Material Facts
In 1984, plaintiff became an Amoco franchisee. In the spring of 1993,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Slatky, John v. Amoco Oil Company, Service Station Dealers of America, Inc., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Bill Sandlin v. Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- H. Wayne Palmer & Associates v. Heldor Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brad Rhodes v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Brad Rhodes v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Brad Rhodes v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Rhodes v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998