Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Marsh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1905No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Osceola; McAlvay, J. Case by Adelbert E. Douglas, by his next friend, against Henry W. Marsh for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover for personal injuries. The material averments of his declaration are quoted:

“For that, whereas, the said defendant heretofore, to wit, on the 11th day of January, 1904, and for a long time prior thereto, controlled and operated a certain sawmill, in connection with which he then and there had, for the purpose of supplying steam to operate said sawmill, a certain steam boiler, in the township of Hartwick, county and State aforesaid, for the purpose of manufacturing saw logs into lumber, etc. In the prosecution of said enter*211prise, at the place and time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Samuelson v. Cleveland Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Willcox v. HinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Johnson v. SpearMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lake Superior Iron Co. v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. O'Malley v. Twenty-Five AssociatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weeren v. Evening News Assn.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Connors-Weyman Steel Co. v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Creen v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kruk v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Leff v. NAC Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API