Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.
Ohio Court of Claims
Decided February 19, 2016No. 2014-00790Published
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Hartman v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.,
2016-Ohio-1254.] FRED HARTMAN Case No. 2014-00790 Plaintiff Judge Patrick M. McGrath Magistrate Anderson M. Renick v. DECISION OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Defendant {¶1} On December 9, 2015, defendant, the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 56(B). On December 31, 2015, plaintiff filed a response. On January 15, 2016, defendant filed a reply and a motion to file the same, which is hereby GRANTED. The motion for summary judgment is now before the court for a non-oral hearing. {¶2}…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Gilbert v. Summit CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Michael Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Coryell v. Bank One Trust Co. N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
- Cindy D. Prebilich-Holland v. Gaylord Entertainment Company, D/B/A Wsm RadioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.