Legal Opinion
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Silkman
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 26, 2017No. 1:16-cv-00205-JAWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO PETITION FOR ORDER AFFIRMING ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On July 17, 2012, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued orders to show cause to an energy consulting firm and its managing member (Respondents), requiring them to show cause why the Commission should not (1) find them in violation of section 222 of the Federal Power. Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. § 824v, and FERC’s rule against energy market manipulation (the Anti-Manipulation Rule); (2) assess civil , penalties against the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Powhatan Energy Fund, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- F.E.R.C. v. SilkmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Barclays Bank PLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017