Legal Opinion
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Barclays Bank PLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 30, 2017No. 2:13-cv-2093 TLN DBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), has filed this action, seeking affirmance of its administrative Order Assessing Civil Penalties (“Assessment Order”) against Defendants. ECF No. 1 (“Petition”). In its Assessment Order, FERC states that Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) and four individuals violated the anti-manipulation provisions of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 824v(a), and FERC’s Anti-Manipulation Rule, 18 C.F.R. 1c.1. Administrative Record (“AR”) 16-66.1 The Assessment Order also assessed penalties and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Powhatan Energy Fund, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- F.E.R.C. v. SilkmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019