Legal Opinion

Azzone v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1961No. Nos. 4-61-Civil 4-58-Crim. 124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

John Frank Azzone (hereinafter re--ferred to as the defendant) has submitted to this Court a Motion under Title-28 U.S.C. § 2255, for an order vacating-a sentence imposed upon him on Novem— *377ber 24, 1958. He has also sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

The basis for the motion to vacate sentence is that the statute under which conviction was had, Title 18 U.S.C. § 1073, is unconstitutional. The single ground for unconstitutionality alleged in the motion to vacate sentence is that Section 1073 is so uncertain and indefinite in its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Domenico Bando, A/K/A 'Nick Bando,' Leo Telvi and Gondolfo Miranti, A/K/A 'Shiekie,'Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Rocco Salvatore Lupino v. United States of America. John Frank Azzone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  5. Story v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Frank Azzone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Azzone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API