Ronay v. Hediger
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
The junior party, Ronay, appeals here from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of- the United States Patent Office, awarding priority to the senior party, Hediger, on the issue of originality, with respect to an invention which relates to a hollow, spray-coated, ceramic electrode for use with arc heating apparatus, especially an electric arc torch designed for underwater cutting on the hull of a ship.
The device, which is not complex, has been sufficiently defined by the counts in issue, 1-9, of which count 6 is illustrative: “6. An electrode for electrical arc…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Payne v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals · 1921
- Mabon v. ShermanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Gram v. WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Kremer v. HarselCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morton S. Degroff v. Daniel D. Roth and Robert M. HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969