Legal Opinion

Ronay v. Hediger

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 8, 1951No. Patent Appeals 5762PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Judge.

The junior party, Ronay, appeals here from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of- the United States Patent Office, awarding priority to the senior party, Hediger, on the issue of originality, with respect to an invention which relates to a hollow, spray-coated, ceramic electrode for use with arc heating apparatus, especially an electric arc torch designed for underwater cutting on the hull of a ship.

The device, which is not complex, has been sufficiently defined by the counts in issue, 1-9, of which count 6 is illustrative: “6. An electrode for electrical arc…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Payne v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Mabon v. ShermanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. Gram v. WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  5. Kremer v. HarselCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morton S. Degroff v. Daniel D. Roth and Robert M. HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API