Legal Opinion
Morton S. Degroff v. Daniel D. Roth and Robert M. Hall
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 24, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8155PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal by the senior party DeGroff is from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention of the two counts in interference No. 94,868 to the junior party, Roth and Hall. DeGroff is involved through patent No. 3,128,079, granted April 7, 1964 on his application filed March 4, 1963 1 and assigned to The Aro Corporation. Roth and Hall are involved on the basis of an application 2 filed November 20, 1963. That application was filed on behalf of Hall and himself by Roth alone and accepted by the Patent Office under its Rule 47 (a) upon it being…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Agawam Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Ronay v. HedigerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- New England Braiding Co., Inc. And Seal Company of New England, Inc. v. A.W. Chesterton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Gambro Lundia Ab v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Hedgewick v. AkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In re LangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- GAF Corp. v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.