Legal Opinion

Webber v. Farmers Chevrolet Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1938No. 14610PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fisi-iburnE.

This action was brought by the plaintiff for the recovery of damages, actual and punitive, growing out of the alleged forcible, unlawful, and willful seizure of an automobile by the defendants.

The defendants set up various defenses by their answers, and, among others, alleged that the automobile was peaceably repossessed, in accordance with the terms and provi sions of a conditional sales contract or chattel mortgage, after condition broken.

Upon the call of the case, the defendants moved that the plaintiff be required to elect…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barfield v. Coker & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  2. Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Lyda v. CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  4. Rosemand v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Spartan Mills v. LawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jh Ellen, Jr. v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. Soulios v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Thompson v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Westerman v. Oregon Automobile Credit Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API