Legal Opinion · Dissent

University of Pittsburgh Tax Exemption Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1962No. Appeal, No. 43Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno :

Every adult person in the Commonwealth carries on his back an invisible sack into which the government periodically drops an ever-increasing burden of taxes. If any person somehow manages to keep his sack closed and empty and the tax-man passes him by, this does not mean that the tax which the escaping person does not pay is lost to the government. The tax-man places the weight of that uncollected tax into other sacks so that the other persons in that given area or classifica*425tion are required to carry heavier loads than otherwise would be theirs. For…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young Mens Christian Assoc. of Germantown v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Ogontz School Tax Exemption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Trustees of Rutgers College v. Township of PiscatawayNew Jersey Tax Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API