Arizona Osteopathic Medical Ass'n v. Fridena
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the issuance of two writs of mandamus 1 requiring that the petitioner, an osteopathic physician, be restored to membership in the Arizona Osteopathic Medical Association and restored to membership and to his position on the staff of the respondent Phoenix General Hospital, Inc.
There are two questions raised on review. The first concerns whether there was sufficient notice and an opportunity to be heard afforded to the petitioner prior to his expulsion from the Association on September 22, 1965.
Under the Bylaws of the Arizona Osteopathic Medical…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Perry v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Berberian v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Blende v. Maricopa County Medical SocietyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arizona Osteopathic Medical Association v. FridenaArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Arizona Osteopathic Medical Ass'n v. FridenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969