Legal Opinion

Arizona Osteopathic Medical Ass'n v. Fridena

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 20, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 670Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 Ariz. App. 232 (1969)

457 P.2d 945

ARIZONA OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, a corporation, and Phoenix General Hospital, Inc., a corporation, Appellants,

v.

Daniel T. FRIDENA, Appellee.

No. 1 CA-CIV 670.

Court of Appeals of Arizona. Division 1.

August 20, 1969.

Rehearing Denied September 22, 1969.

Lewis, Roca, Beauchamp & Linton, by Roger W. Kaufman, Phoenix, for appellants.

Dykes, Selden, Bayham & Fike, by Alan Philip Bayham, Phoenix, for appellee.

MOLLOY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the issuance of two writs of mandamus[1] requiring that the petitioner, an osteopathic physician, be restored to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Perry v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  4. Berberian v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Blende v. Maricopa County Medical SocietyArizona Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API