Arizona Osteopathic Medical Ass'n v. Fridena
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
10 Ariz. App. 232 (1969)
457 P.2d 945
ARIZONA OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, a corporation, and Phoenix General Hospital, Inc., a corporation, Appellants,
v.
Daniel T. FRIDENA, Appellee.
No. 1 CA-CIV 670.
Court of Appeals of Arizona. Division 1.
August 20, 1969.
Rehearing Denied September 22, 1969.
Lewis, Roca, Beauchamp & Linton, by Roger W. Kaufman, Phoenix, for appellants.
Dykes, Selden, Bayham & Fike, by Alan Philip Bayham, Phoenix, for appellee.
MOLLOY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the issuance of two writs of mandamus[1] requiring that the petitioner, an osteopathic physician, be restored to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Perry v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Berberian v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Blende v. Maricopa County Medical SocietyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.