Legal Opinion

Texas Health & Human Services Commission v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided February 8, 2016No. Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-3851-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

David C. Godbey, United States District Judge

This Order addresses Plaintiff Texas Health and Human Services Commission’s (the “Commission”) amended application for preliminary injunction against Defendant International Rescue Committee, Inc. (“IRC”) and the Federal Defendants1 [17]. Because the Commission has failed to establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury and because the applicable statutes do not contemplate a judicial remedy, the Court denies the application.

I. Introduction

Federal district courts are “courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of West Sacramento v. R & L Business ManagementDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. Navajo Nation v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian RelocationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  3. The Gray Casualty & Surety Company v. 3i Contracting LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
  4. The Guarantee Company of North America USA v. RKM Utility Services IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
  5. Utility Construction Services LLC v. WaltersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API