Legal Opinion

People v. Reynolds

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 2011No. E051311PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CODRINGTON, J.

I

INTRODUCTION1

Defendant Anthony Earl Reynolds appeals from a trial court order on July 6, 2010, in which the court found defendant incompetent to stand trial and ordered him committed to Patton State Hospital (Patton) pursuant to Penal Code section 1370.2

Defendant contends the trial court violated his equal protection rights under In re Banks (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 864 [152 Cal.Rptr. 111] [Fourth Dist., Div. Two] (Banks), by ordering him confined at Patton in excess of the three-year maximum commitment term under section 1370, subdivision (c)(1). Specifically, defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Conservatorship of HofferberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re PolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. G.H.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. Jackson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Calloway v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Conservatorship of Hans A. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. Ramirez CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API