Legal Opinion

Stanul v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1994No. 3-92-619-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury found appellant guilty of murder and assessed punishment at imprisonment for seven years. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02 (West 1989). Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, both factually and legally, to support the conviction. He also complains of the jury finding that a deadly weapon was used in the commission of the offense. We will affirm.

1. Sufficiency of evidence

On June 15, 1991, emergency medical personnel were called to the apartment occupied by appellant, his wife, Ann Marie Stan-ul, and their son, eight-month-old Zachariah Stanul. They found appellant and his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Orona v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Regan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  4. Tovar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  5. Teddie Davenport v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API