Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Reserve Supply Co. v. Nowalk & Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1994No. Civ. A. 91-0449PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOWELL A. REED, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff Philadelphia Reserve Supply Company (“PRSCO”) brought this action against defendants Nowalk & Associates, Inc., Joseph W. Johnson, Riehard G. Nowalk, Michael A. Hudy, John Tedesco, Barry Weshnak, Jeffrey Walsh, William Greenberg, Peter H. Wegener, Joseph Tomasek, and Bathgate, Wegener, Wouters and Neumann, P.C. claiming that they engaged in a scheme to defraud plaintiff which violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 (“federal RICO”), violated the New Jersey Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Area Water Authority v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Leonard A. Feinberg, Inc. v. Central Asia Capital Corp., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Hittle v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Bardsley v. Powell, Trachtman, Logan, Carrle & Bowman, P.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Cataldo v. MosesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API