Legal Opinion
Livery Owners Coalition v. State Insurance Fund
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Tompkins, J.
The constitutionality of the law and its enforcement by the State Insurance Fund that provides that livery car base *906owners must pay workers’ compensation premiums on behalf of the independent owner-operators is the issue before the court. It arises in the context of the Livery Owners Coalition and individual livery owners’1 motion for an order enjoining the State Insurance Fund and the Workers’ Compensation Board from enforcing the statute and the State Insurance Fund’s application for an order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and declaring the statute2…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maresca v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- City of New York v. City Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Golden v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Arvatz v. Empire Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re Clumber Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Weingarten v. XYZ Two Way Radio Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Claim of Nkrumah v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Munkacs Car Service Ltd.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2006