Legal Opinion
In Re Klein's Outlet, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 1942No. 79509PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
The proceedings heretofore had herein are conflicting and confusing. Creditors ask that the debtor be continued in possession. They do so in spite of the fact that a judge of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has found in a stockholder’s derivative suit brought by Rose Klein against the debtor and others that those now in control of the debtor have mismanaged the property of the debtor and wasted, lost and acquired to themselves and transferred to others money and property of the debtor. Subsequently and on September 24, 1941, the, judge decided to appoint a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Freshman v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Zeitinger v. Hargadine-Mckittrick Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- In Re SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Struthers Furnace Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- In Re ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Victory Const. Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981
- Klein v. Nu-Way Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- In Re Corporate & Leisure Event Productions, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2006
- In Re Orchards Village Investments, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- Sino Clean Energy Inc. ex rel. Baowen Ren v. SeidenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017