Legal Opinion

Burley v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2012No. OP 11-0021PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 The United States District Court for the District of Montana certified the following question to this Court:

¶2 With respect to the continuing tort doctrine, does Montana law, as applied to the facts set forth in Magistrate Judge Ostby’s Findings and Recommendations, toll the statute of limitations for property damage claims of nuisance and/or trespass resulting from contamination which has stabilized, continues to migrate, and is not readily or easily abatable?

¶3 Claims related to property contamination that involve issues of statutes of limitations, continuing torts, and the nature of…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Christian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Johnston v. Centennial Log Homes & Furnishings, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. McEwen v. MCR, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Meek v. Montana Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API