Legal Opinion
Kingston Dry Dock Co. v. Lake Champlain Transp. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 4, 1929No. 16-552PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The cause has been argued as though it made a difference whether the attachment was valid as against the conditional seller under the laws of New York. This could be so only in ease the respondent’s interest in the boats was itself not leviable in a suit in the admiralty, in which ease the attachment must be either wholly void or good even against the interest of the conditional seller. We may agree, since the conditional sales were made in 1920, and the Conditional Sales Law (Personal Property Law [Consol. Laws, c. 41, art. 4]) was enacted only in 1922,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fisser v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- James Papa v. Katy Industries, Inc. And Walsh Press Company, Inc., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Gjhsrt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.