Legal Opinion
Bau v. Actamed Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 6, 2002No. A01A1776PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Acting pro se, Norman Bau, a former employee of Actamed Corporation, sued the company for breach of contract.1 After both parties moved for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment to Actamed and denied Bau’s motion. Bau appeals this ruling, and upon review, we affirm.. Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and when the undisputed facts, viewed most favorably to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991); see OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). When reviewing the grant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Caswell v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Collier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Sofran Peachtree City, LLC v. Peachtree City Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- George L. Smith II Georgia World Congress Center Authority v. Soft Comdex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bau v. Actamed CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 2003