Legal Opinion

Myers v. Eich

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2006No. 23837PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In 1999, William Myers advanced Michael and Sheri Eich $125,000 to redeem their property from foreclosure. The transaction between the parties included a warranty deed and contemporaneous contract for deed. Over the next several years, Myers continued to advance the Eichs money. With one advance, Myers amended the 1999 contract for deed; with another, he had the Eichs execute new warranty deeds. The Eichs, however, could not get ahead and became delinquent on their obligation. Ultimately, Myers informed them that he was going to sell the property. He then brought a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brenneman Mechanical & Electrical, Inc. v. First National Bank of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Adrian v. McKinnieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  4. Meyerson v. WernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Englehart v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finstad v. GordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. FarmPro Services, Inc. v. FinnemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Sturzenbecher v. Sioux County Ranch, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Northstream Investments, Inc. v. 1804 Country Store Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API