Legal Opinion · Dissent

Quillin v. Colquhoun

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1926Published

1Dissent

BUDGE, J.,

Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. — After carefully considering the record in this case I have reached the conclusion that the trial court did not err in refusing to give appellants’ requested instructions Nos. 2 and 17, covering the provisions of subd. 16, sec. 1, c. 249, Sess. Laws 1921. That subdivision, so far as it relates to the speed limit at schoolhouses, was enacted for the benefit of school children, and when violated as against a child or children it is negligence per se. (Winsor v. Fonda, 126 Wash. 402, 218 Pac. 219; Stoddard v. Smathers, 120 Wash. 53, 206 Pac.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. SmathersWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Walters v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Falls Township v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  4. Winsor v. FondaWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API