Legal Opinion

In Re Dyer Custom Installation, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 1, 2004No. 05-04-00416-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION NUNC PRO TUNC

Opinion by

Justice WHITTINGTON.

In this mandamus proceeding, Dyer Custom Installation, Inc., Joseph Geeting, and Susan Lambert (collectively “DCI”) contend the trial judge abused his discretion in granting Craig Dyer’s application for writ of mandamus to inspect corporate books and records under article 2.44(D) of the business corporation act. See Tex. Bus. CoRP. Act Ann. art. 2.44(D) (Vernon Supp.2004). DCI claims it raised a fact issue regarding Dyer’s “proper purpose” for the request to inspect the corporate books and records and was entitled to a jury trial on this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. General Motors Corp. v. GayleTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY v. LoughridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Chavco Inv. Co., Inc. v. PybusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Guaranty Old Line Life Co. v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Kimberly-Clark Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  2. Texas Ear Nose & Throat Consultants, PLLC, Joseph Edmonds, Newton Duncan and James Albright v. John K. Jones M.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Biolustre' Inc. v. Hair Ventures LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  4. Biolustre' Inc. v. Hair Ventures LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  5. Pacific World Energy LTD v. PIE Investments LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API