Legal Opinion

Locke v. Leonard Silk Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. The facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

Defendant in error commenced an action of assumpsit in justice’s court to recover the amount due on a promissory note given by Locke to the company. The suit was commenced by summons returnable August 5th. On the return day after joining issue, counsel for defendant moved the court for a continuance of the cause on account of the sickness of the defendant. Plaintiff’s counsel then admitted that the defendant had been sick and unable to attend to business on the previous day. An affidavit was filed setting forth that the defendant was still in a weak condition and that in the opinion of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Mercer v. Lowell National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Middleton v. GriffithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  2. Reading v. BeardsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API