In re Freedlander

This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of tlie United States Patent Office affirming a decision of *1180the Primary Examiner rejecting for lack of invention over the cited prior art claims 20, 21, 22, and 23 of appellant’s application for a patent. No claims were allowed. : '

Claim 20 is illustrative of the subject matter involved and reads as follows:

20. A raw edge belt comprising a belt body formed of laminated layers, said layers providing a compression, neutral axis and tension section, a rubberized fabric portion forming the inner surface side of the belt,…