Legal Opinion
Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 22, 2014No. 2012-1679, 2013-1123PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Mformation Technologies, Inc. and mFormation Software Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “Mformation”) appeal the grant of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that Defendants-Ap-pellees Research In Motion Limited and Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “BlackBerry 1 ”) do not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,970,917 (“'917 patent”). See Mformation Techs., Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd., No. C08-04990, 2012 WL 3222237 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 8, 2012). Because the district court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Paul J. Glick v. White Motor Company v. North American Rockwell Corp., (Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. Mustek Systems, Inc. And Mustek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Interactive Gift Express, Inc. v. Compuserve Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Wi-Lan, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Fastship, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Dionex Softron Gmbh v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.