Legal Opinion
Pulliam v. Petersen
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 22, 2024No. 8:22-cv-01381Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND LINDSAY P. PULLIAM, Plaintiff, Vv. FRANK E. PETERSEN, III and Civil Action No. TDC-22-1381 THE LORETTA I. EASTON REVOCABLE TRUST, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Lindsay P. Pulliam has filed this civil action against Defendants Frank E. Petersen, III (“Frank Petersen”) and The Loretta I. Easton Revocable Trust (“the Trust”), in which she alleges claims of conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, and deceit arising from Frank Petersen’s administration of the Trust, for which she seeks injunctive relief. Pending before the Court is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Niya Kenny v. Alan WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.