Legal Opinion
United States v. Boyd
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 1, 2010No. 09 Cr. 347(JSR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
Defendant Anthony Boyd moves pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for a new trial, following his conviction by a jury on November 30, 2009 of 2 counts of bank robbery, 12 counts of armed bank robbery, and one count of escape. Although most of the issues raised in Boyd’s motion — such as his contention that the Government’s DNA expert gave “fraudulent” testimony, see Motion for A New Trial at 3 — are both factually baseless and without legal merit, the Court construes his motion, drafted pro se, 1 to also re-raise the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Rector v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
- State v. Medicine EagleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.