Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Yohe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2013PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

George William Yohe, II, (Appellant) appeals from the Superior Court order that reversed the trial court’s order awarding a new trial on the ground that his constitutional right of confrontation was violated. We agree with the Superior Court that Appellant’s constitutional right of confrontation was not violated at trial because the testifying witness was not a “surrogate witness,” as Appellant argues. Rather, as discussed below, the witness was the author of the testimonial statement offered into evidence and, therefore, was an appropriate witness under the Confrontation…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Washington v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. State v. Katherine Lea StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. State v. Julie L. Michaels (072106)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. AkrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API