Legal Opinion

Ennis v. . Ennis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakesoN, J.

The plaintiffs present the question: “Whether or not a deed from a father to a son, setting out in the face of the deed as consideration, the obligation of the son to institute and finance a suit in the father’s name, is void by reason of the violation of the law of champerty and maintenance.” It may be noted that the consideration is to “prose cute” a suit for the recovery of the land and also the further consideration of “love and affection,” and the land is deeded subject to a life estate of the grantor, father, and his wife Catherine. This interesting question we think unnecessary for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booth v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Whitten v. PeaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Barbee v. . BumpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Justice v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Jones v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API