Legal Opinion

Barbee v. . Bumpass

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 31, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

In tbe language of a Cherokee Indian, “the plaintiffs have lawed the defendants to kill a deed,” in fact two; or, in other words, the action is one, brought under C. S., 1743, to quiet title or. to remove a cloud therefrom, which, it is alleged, arises out of a claim by the defendants to the lands in question by reason of two deeds executed by Jennie Barbee to her husband, Green Barbee, 19 February, 1913, without complying, in either case, with the provisions of O. S., 2515, requiring the probate officer, as a condition precedent to the validity of the conveyance, to certify in his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Whitten v. PeaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Bland v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Wallin v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McCullen v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Bolin v. BolinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Daughtry v. . DaughtrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Farabow v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API