Harwick v. Weddington
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Sac Circxdt Court. This action and two others, appearing under the same name, were brought to enable tbe plaintiff to recover for damages alleged to have been sustained by tbe wrongful levy upon and seizure by the defendant, as sheriff, of certain personal property alleged to belong to plaintiff. The three actions were consolidated, and tried to a i’nry, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Oh. J.
I. The motion to consolidate was made by the plaintiff. To the order sustaining the motion the defendant excepted, and he now assigns the ruling as error.
i pkactice: j>?actions';1011 co^defend? .uus. The first action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, Weddington, and H. Y. & T. Slutz. The second was brought by him against Weddington and Sweitser & Currier, and the third was brought by him against Weddington and the -First National Bank of Storm Lake. The co-defendants of Weddington, in the respective cases, were the creditors for whom, and under whose direction,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Courtright v. LeonardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
3Cited by6 opinions
- Welch v. SpiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Bank of Montreal v. IngersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Sempel v. Northern Hardwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Martin Bros. & Co. v. LesanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Deere, Wells & Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.