Perry v. Kramer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner Richard L. Perry appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Perry’s claim that defendants acted with deliberate indifference when they required him to lie in the prone position during emergency situations because the facts as alleged do not rise to the level of an Eighth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mabe v. San Bernardino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.