Legal Opinion
United States v. Jaime Aberlado Basalo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2001No. 00-10457PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals from Basalo’s sentence, requesting that it be reversed due to a downward departure of eight levels from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. The district court determined that such departure was warranted because “Basalo was prejudiced by two unusual postoffense circumstances-failure of the government to disclose potential impeachment material and gross misconduct by trial counsel.” United States v. Basalo, 109 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1227 (N.D.Cal.2000). The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231. We have jurisdiction over this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Roseli Banuelos-Rodriguez, Aka: Rogelio Banuelos-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Anthony CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Mario Martinez, United States of America v. Steven Cox, A/K/A BobbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Leland Duane YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Claudio DibeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Claudio DibeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Cruz-SalasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Leland Duane YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.